Democracy the Winner in New Hampshire

The most surprising news from the New Hampshire primary may have been how wrong the opinion-poll predictions were. Most gave Democrat Barrack Obama double-digit leads going into Tuesday’s voting. But Hillary Clinton won. Though the polls were right about the Republican contest, pundits were stunned. MSNBC’s Chris Matthews called for an inquiry on polling methodology. A colleague said that in future we should put more trust in the American people and wait for the voters to decide. Matthews said, “But then what will we do?”

Slate.com asked what would happen if polling were banned. Its answer—more attention would have to be paid to results.

There are questions about how polling and its uses affect our democracy. Does forecasting outcomes take away from the excitement of politics? Give the public the impression that elections are a done deal and individual votes don’t matter?

Diana Mutz, a University of Pennsylvania expert in political communication, says politics has lost a sense of suspense and that regaining it would do a lot to rebuild interest. View our interview with Professor Mutz.

Filed Under: superbowl, primaries, Opinion Polling, new hampshire primary, elections, Diana Mutz, Chris Matthews

…and so is this post! New Hampshire demonstrates that there can still be some surprises in politics.

It is well worth taking a look at the Brokaw-Matthews exchange if you didn’t follow it live (it’s about 90 seconds into this clip):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVQ275FSr3E

Leave a Comment:

Verification Question
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
five + three =
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
You can change notification settings on your user account edit page.
“By the People: Citizenship in the 21st Century”