Shirking civic duties comes with consequences
Shirking civic duties comes with consequences
Discussions of important civic duties almost always include two — voting and jury duty.
While a statistical blip might occur from time to time, the voting record of Americans in the past several decades pretty much stinks — from local races to those of national significance.
I think most people believe jury duty fares no better. Many localities used to pull potential jurors from registered-voter rolls. Anecdotal evidence suggests that it caused some people to not register, a kind of civic engagement double whammy. Rolls of potential jurors now get pulled from multiple sources such as registered voters, driver’s license data and even state income tax filings.
Ducking jury duty seems odd.
Among all the constitutional rights, the right to a trial by a jury of your peers sits among the most revered. Paula Hannaford-Agor, the director of the Center for Jury Studies at the National Center for State Courts, in Williamsburg, Va., attests to that and to the penchant for ducking jury duty.
“You have almost this bipolar reaction,” she said about people who try to dodge jury duty.
Research shows that approximately 75 percent of the public finds trial by jury the most important aspect of the system, she said. But when called to duty that same public says, “It is — but not this week,” she said.
However, reason for optimism exists because Hannaford-Agor said research shows:
• some 30 percent of the U.S. population today did jury duty. And the vast majority has a very good experience and believes the experience makes them better citizens.
• most jurisdictions now do a better job of managing the jury system and dealing with key issues that make people shy from it such as convenience and compensation.
But lack of civic engagement can still lead to a lack of potential jurors.
I have learned that if you cannot manage yourself, someone else will manage you and more often than not, you will not like it.
So the news comes from Colorado and Vermont that inadequate jury pools led court administrators to send officers of the court out to round up potential jurors.
People could not manage themselves with regard to an important civic obligation. Someone decided to manage them, and nobody seems to like it.
The Feb. 4 article in The National Law Journal reported that officers went to malls and grocery stores, where they would issue a summons for jury duty, grab up shoppers and take them to court. In those states, the law allows that process, and Hannaford-Agor said the practice has been around for centuries.
Some lawyers think it stinks and that those prospective jurors caught in the roundup vent their frustration on the system and maybe even defendants.
Hannaford-Agor said juror roundups rarely happen, and it usually reflects poorly managed jurisdictions where the public knows nothing happens when they ignore the call to serve. As for the value of a “roundup,” she puts it this way: “It’s a horrible experience for a citizen. You might as well just run them over with a truck.”
Are juror roundups a good idea or fraught with problems? When we cannot manage ourselves “civically,” should someone else manage us?
Resources:
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
