More and more these days, lawmakers want to butt into the business of schools.

They justify doing it for a lot of reasons — none of them with much value. But they sound good and provide what lawmakers want first and foremost: political fund-raising mantra and votes.

Each time politicians who fiddle with learning get away with, it opens the door for more fiddling and at different levels.

Lawmakers in Kentucky want K-12 schools to teach the Christian faith in “world religion” classes. Lawmakers have floated bills to penalize college teachers who miss the deadline for ordering books for their classes. And lawmakers want to homogenize Kentucky college curricula.

And now in Texas, the state board of education wants the social studies curriculum to have a more politically “conservative” signature, especially in history and economics textbooks and including questioning the Founding Fathers’ commitment to separation of church and state.

Please note: The 10-5 vote was along “party” lines.

Politics and education do not mix.

The angst that books cause bureaucrats, politicians and ideologues runs the course of history. I read recently that in the 20 states where boards dictate curriculum and textbook content, battles such as the one in Texas happen all the time. Often that means teaching a white, Christian, heterosexual and male view of the world.

For example, during the Texas battle over books, Hispanic board members wanted more references to Latinos to provide role models for the state’s youth.

Those efforts consistently failed.

One did pass in the area of sociology: A conservative member of the Texas board got an amendment approved requiring the teaching of “the importance of personal responsibility for life choices” in a section on teenage suicide, dating violence, sexuality, drug use and eating disorders.

I think these approaches to implant revisionist history, faith-based natural and behavioral sciences, and political agendas poison education and threaten learning.

What do you think?


Filed Under:

Thanks for the post. Perhaps, but I choose to look at government support for public education differently. State constitutions require it — not support it and meddle in it. The constitutions do not attach strings, such as the one you suggest. Also, it is in the best interest for states to support public education while letting educators do the educating. The quality of school systems equates to more people, economic development, a more educated citizenry, better quality of life and other benefits. It's an investment and a wise one. Using public money for public education to push political agendas hijacks the intent of the constitutional directive from my view.


When public education stops taking government money, they can argue that government meddles in their affairs too much. Unfortunately, the schools in those districts you mentioned are--like everyone else--at the mercy of those who sign their checks.


Thanks for the post. I think you hit on a key point: what Texas students "won't learn." Misdirected, politically based efforts to "sanitize" history are not new. In fact, "history" shows they have happened for centuries. I guess the leaders in Texas who pushed this measure through didn't learn about those while in school — or the negative consequences that have accompanied them. Mac


Texas takes the prize for idiotic textbook curriculum changes. The right wing conservative Christian beliefs are the only things that will remain in their textbooks. Pity the children there for what they won’t learn.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <blockquote> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <object> <param> <embed> <p> <small> <hr> <br> <u> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5>
  • You can use Markdown syntax to format and style the text. Also see Markdown Extra for tables, footnotes, and more.

More information about formatting options